The Value Vectors Diagnostic
The Value Vectors Diagnostic presents the Value Vectors online for respondents to evaluate in a fully secure environment, where no technical knowledge is required, and where all information and data is held securely (and not shared with any third party).
A third-person style of evaluation is typically used, where “they” are described by the Value Vectors and the respondents assess how far these descriptions “fit” who or what is being evaluated – the person, team or organisation.
A version with direct evaluation is also available, but the “indirect” approach makes the evaluation seem less “confronting”.
(It also “hides” the Value Vectors themselves behind the descriptions so that respondents review the descriptions at face value, without either trying to avoid or align with particular values.)
With standard reporting, enhanced by visualisations that use the “wheel” structure of the Value Vectors, the diagnostic output:
- Presents a full and holistic picture of all values, including to understand which are out of focus or being set aside.
- Shows which values are complementary to ones that should be developed and which aren’t, e.g. with adaptability:
- “Adjacent” values would cover both (i) the relational and interpersonal aspects that encourage (and make safe) adaptability, and (ii) the results-driven aspects that ensure ideas come to fruition.
- “Opposite” values would be about consolidation, tradition and conformity – not inherently bad things, but potentially working against adaptability.
- Identifies potential “conflicts” between current and desired culture (including in terms of the individuals that operate within that culture).
- Makes comparisons between organisations where applicable, to understand varying priorities and perspectives – even culture clashes.
Extended reporting allows for exploration of the symptoms that may flow from a particular values “profile”, as well as allowing individuals to compare themselves against the “culture” emerging from the responses of other participants.
What to use the Value Vectors Diagnostic For
The diagnostic can be used as a personal evaluation tool – including for 360 feedback – but its main innovation is that it is primarily designed for evaluating organisations, and thus culture.
This has several applications:
- Understanding organisational drivers, strengths and weaknesses – this could follow running the Symptoms of What’s Not Working diagnostic, for example, or be run standalone.
- Identifying goals most sympathetic to, and achievable with, the values held.
- Evaluating organisational compatibility, either during a relationship or in the planning and negotiation stages.
- Customer profiling, to understand what your existing (or ideal) customers value and what they therefore prioritise.
- Relationship management, where two organisations typically assess one of them, e.g. for a customer to communicate its expected values and help a key supplier understand and operate consistently with them.
Articles related to Value Vectors and Diagnostics:
Just Asking About Things That Matter: Necessary but not Sufficient
When people begin grasping the significance of Things That Matter, they often rush to pop the “what matters to you?” question to colleagues and counterparts. That’s a great start and it’s necessary, but it’s not sufficient. Fail to realize this, and you’ll waste the opportunity…
Why “Things That Matter” really do matter: Part 4: The Alternative
There is a way out of the mess we’re in with the Things That Matter. It’s a comprehensive but simple three step process that makes the subjective objective, and the intangible tangible – all through engagement, motivation and change….
Value Management: SMARTER than SMART
Most of us are probably familiar with the concept of SMART goals. Value Management not only encapsulates SMART, but takes it further in three ways: meeting the challenge of Measurability, doubling-up the SMART and making goals SMARTER. Let’s see how….
The Current Cutting Edge?
Having attended a recent collaborative working event, it seems that the “cutting edge” of working with partners is occasional consultant-led interviews with a few key people that was then quantitatively analysed around KPIs. Is this really the best possible?!…
Defining Value Vectors
We have developed a “Value Vectors Diagnostic”, but what is a “value vector”? Where do they come from? And how can they be understood and used?…
Diagnostics are NOT Surveys
People often use the words “diagnostic” and “survey” interchangeably. They really shouldn’t. Beyond superficial similarities, the differences are profound – who is doing the measuring, what is being measured and why – and so are the results….
Mastering Complexity: Part 3
In this final part of our Complexity series, we establish what a Complexity-appropriate conceptual framework looks like, the necessary operational transformations it leads to, and how Value Management supports all of it….
ARC Perspectives
“ARC” is the “branding” we’ve given our ARC Diagnostics – our online framework and platform for secure and rapid spreading and scaling of Diagnostic processes – but what does “ARC” mean and how is it useful? Let’s find out….